The center of useful idiots thinks that John McCain should "provide detailed, timely disclosure about his health."

So far, he has failed to meet this obligation to voters, even though he is now the presumed Republican nominee.

The Times claims McCain should reveal this information for two reasons. First, in this era of modern medical science and extended life spans, McCain could be the oldest man ever to become president. Second, he once had skin cancer — even though he beat cancer and today is cancer free, as evidenced by his lack of stops at hospitals for radiation treatments during the rigorous months on the campaign trail.

The Red Rag goes further, declaring:

No presidential candidate should get to the point that he has locked up his party’s nomination without public vetting of his health.

And where was the NY Times when half the voting population was demanding Kerry’s medical records from the Vietnam war? Ah, perhaps the Times thinks that sick people can’t lead while character is unimportant.

What am I thinking? Of course they don’t believe character is important. Did they even read Obama’s book? I’m talking about his first one, in which he reveals his true self.