<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Amendment Protecting Property Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alphapatriot.com/new-amendment-protecting-property-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alphapatriot.com/new-amendment-protecting-property-rights/</link>
	<description>Observations of a Reformed Liberal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 12:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlphaPatriot</title>
		<link>http://alphapatriot.com/new-amendment-protecting-property-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-3171</link>
		<dc:creator>AlphaPatriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.7.204.200/~alphapat/?p=4062#comment-3171</guid>
		<description>Rick, thank you for reminding me what it is like to live overseas (it&#039;s been a while) and for chastising me for not keeping my readership in mind. I do tend to forget that I&#039;m not writing this just for my family anymore.
Please stop by again and always feel free to post a comment.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick, thank you for reminding me what it is like to live overseas (it&#8217;s been a while) and for chastising me for not keeping my readership in mind. I do tend to forget that I&#8217;m not writing this just for my family anymore.<br />
Please stop by again and always feel free to post a comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlphaPatriot</title>
		<link>http://alphapatriot.com/new-amendment-protecting-property-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-3170</link>
		<dc:creator>AlphaPatriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.7.204.200/~alphapat/?p=4062#comment-3170</guid>
		<description>Phil, given the conflicting decisions handed down yesterday concerning the 10 Commandments on public property I&#039;d say you are absolutely correct. Sometimes it seems that these guys make it up as they go along.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, given the conflicting decisions handed down yesterday concerning the 10 Commandments on public property I&#8217;d say you are absolutely correct. Sometimes it seems that these guys make it up as they go along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://alphapatriot.com/new-amendment-protecting-property-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-3169</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.7.204.200/~alphapat/?p=4062#comment-3169</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s not bad, but it should also include a statement to the effect:
The purpose of this ammendment is to protect private property and to grant to government a very limited power of eminent domain. If there is ever confusion about the meaning or intent of this amendment, benefit of the doubt shall be given to the protection of to private property.
We might as well say it openly so that future generations will be sure of its meaning.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not bad, but it should also include a statement to the effect:<br />
The purpose of this ammendment is to protect private property and to grant to government a very limited power of eminent domain. If there is ever confusion about the meaning or intent of this amendment, benefit of the doubt shall be given to the protection of to private property.<br />
We might as well say it openly so that future generations will be sure of its meaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberty</title>
		<link>http://alphapatriot.com/new-amendment-protecting-property-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-3168</link>
		<dc:creator>liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.7.204.200/~alphapat/?p=4062#comment-3168</guid>
		<description>Nice.  But the first part &quot;Tax on all property, real and personal, except as income or on sale or transfer, above one-tenth of one percent per annum shall be prohibited.&quot; - what is that supposed to limit?  Income, sales and transfer (eg inheritance) are just about all our taxes, I guess property taxes are above and beyond that, on homes?
Well, I would be in favor the amendment, though it should not be required and I would rather it stricter in limiting taxes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice.  But the first part &#8220;Tax on all property, real and personal, except as income or on sale or transfer, above one-tenth of one percent per annum shall be prohibited.&#8221; &#8211; what is that supposed to limit?  Income, sales and transfer (eg inheritance) are just about all our taxes, I guess property taxes are above and beyond that, on homes?<br />
Well, I would be in favor the amendment, though it should not be required and I would rather it stricter in limiting taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Smothermon</title>
		<link>http://alphapatriot.com/new-amendment-protecting-property-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-3167</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Smothermon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 15:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.7.204.200/~alphapat/?p=4062#comment-3167</guid>
		<description>Sir, I don&#039;t consider myself stunningly uninformed.  I will admit that it is harder to keep up with U.S. issues as an expatriate in the Asia-Pacific area; however, I think you exaggerate when you call me &quot;stunningly uninformed&quot; because I&#039;m not familiar with &quot;the direction that the right of individuals to own property is taking&quot; back home.
Are you stunningly uninformed of the global distribution of your readership?  If not, then I&#039;d suggest you&#039;ve never tried keeping abreast of U.S. issues while living overseas.  It&#039;s not easy; but I am trying.
Yours truly,
Rick Smothermon
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir, I don&#8217;t consider myself stunningly uninformed.  I will admit that it is harder to keep up with U.S. issues as an expatriate in the Asia-Pacific area; however, I think you exaggerate when you call me &#8220;stunningly uninformed&#8221; because I&#8217;m not familiar with &#8220;the direction that the right of individuals to own property is taking&#8221; back home.<br />
Are you stunningly uninformed of the global distribution of your readership?  If not, then I&#8217;d suggest you&#8217;ve never tried keeping abreast of U.S. issues while living overseas.  It&#8217;s not easy; but I am trying.<br />
Yours truly,<br />
Rick Smothermon<br />
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TriggerFinger</title>
		<link>http://alphapatriot.com/new-amendment-protecting-property-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-3172</link>
		<dc:creator>TriggerFinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 01:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.7.204.200/~alphapat/?p=4062#comment-3172</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;An amendment to protect private property..&lt;/strong&gt;

I say go for it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>An amendment to protect private property..</strong></p>
<p>I say go for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ Jackson</title>
		<link>http://alphapatriot.com/new-amendment-protecting-property-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-3166</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.7.204.200/~alphapat/?p=4062#comment-3166</guid>
		<description>While the proposed amendment is good what use is it when you have five senile Leftwingnuts who use the existing Constitution for toilet paper?  Its time to hang some judges.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the proposed amendment is good what use is it when you have five senile Leftwingnuts who use the existing Constitution for toilet paper?  Its time to hang some judges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

