<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FBI Can Eavesdrop Even When Cell Phone is Off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alphapatriot.com/fbi-can-eavesdrop-even-when-cell-phone-is-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alphapatriot.com/fbi-can-eavesdrop-even-when-cell-phone-is-off/</link>
	<description>Observations of a Reformed Liberal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:35:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heartless Libertarian</title>
		<link>http://alphapatriot.com/fbi-can-eavesdrop-even-when-cell-phone-is-off/comment-page-1/#comment-4171</link>
		<dc:creator>Heartless Libertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.7.204.200/~alphapat/?p=5386#comment-4171</guid>
		<description>Not just the FBI...hackers can do it too.  They can even use your cell phone camera.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/98912.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/98912.html&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/98881.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/98881.html&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not just the FBI&#8230;hackers can do it too.  They can even use your cell phone camera.<br />
<a href="http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/98912.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/98912.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/98881.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/98881.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magus</title>
		<link>http://alphapatriot.com/fbi-can-eavesdrop-even-when-cell-phone-is-off/comment-page-1/#comment-4170</link>
		<dc:creator>Magus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.7.204.200/~alphapat/?p=5386#comment-4170</guid>
		<description>On a side note, the &quot;right to privacy&quot; &lt;b&gt;was not&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;invented&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; by the courts.
The &quot;right to be let alone&quot; is an ancient right long recognized in common law.
As far as my research has uncovered, the first use of the term &quot;right to privacy&quot; was about 117 years ago in &lt;i&gt;The Right to Privacy&lt;/i&gt;, Warren and Brandeis, 4 Harvard L.R. 193 (1890)), but, the idea of a &lt;i&gt;right of privacy&lt;/i&gt; goes back thousands of years.
Early invasions of privacy were treated as trespass, assault, or eavesdropping. People believed they had a right &quot;to be let alone&quot; long before the phrase &quot;right to privacy&quot; was coined.
As far as I know, the first use of the phrase &quot;right to be let alone&quot; by the USSC was in 1834. The U.S. Supreme Court stated that a &quot;defendant asks nothing — wants nothing, but to be let alone until it can be shown that he has violated the rights of another.&quot; Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. 591, 634 (1834)
The &quot;right to privacy&quot; is an ancient concept, the term is what&#039;s new (well, if you consider 117 years old new).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a side note, the &#8220;right to privacy&#8221; <b>was not</b> <b><i>invented</i></b> by the courts.<br />
The &#8220;right to be let alone&#8221; is an ancient right long recognized in common law.<br />
As far as my research has uncovered, the first use of the term &#8220;right to privacy&#8221; was about 117 years ago in <i>The Right to Privacy</i>, Warren and Brandeis, 4 Harvard L.R. 193 (1890)), but, the idea of a <i>right of privacy</i> goes back thousands of years.<br />
Early invasions of privacy were treated as trespass, assault, or eavesdropping. People believed they had a right &#8220;to be let alone&#8221; long before the phrase &#8220;right to privacy&#8221; was coined.<br />
As far as I know, the first use of the phrase &#8220;right to be let alone&#8221; by the USSC was in 1834. The U.S. Supreme Court stated that a &#8220;defendant asks nothing — wants nothing, but to be let alone until it can be shown that he has violated the rights of another.&#8221; Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. 591, 634 (1834)<br />
The &#8220;right to privacy&#8221; is an ancient concept, the term is what&#8217;s new (well, if you consider 117 years old new).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

